X-Men: Apocalypse, the latest superhero adventure in a summer full of superhero flicks, and a sort of trilogy conclusion to the X-Men: First Class trilogy of films. Can this next X-Men film stand against the various other superhero films this summer? Well, let's find out!
Directed by: Bryan Singer
Genre: Action, Comic Book, Sci-Fi,
Release Date: May 27, 2016
Running Time: 144 minutes
MMPA rating: PG-13
The Good: Quicksilver's scene is one of the best movie scenes all year, Magneto continues to be the emotional core. Superb performances across the board, Epic cameo, Apocalypse is a unique type of evil, Often quite funny, Impressive kills, Excellent new cast, Great soundtrack, 80s setting and references, Star Wars meta-humor, Revising history, Oscar Isaac nails it, Quicksilver is the best thing ever, Impressive special effects, Interesting world building,
The Bad: Less accessible to those not invested in the franchise, One missed opportunity, Somewhat generic finale,
Plot: 7.2/10- Opening with a scene in ancient Egypt, the film shows how Apocalypse was buried for thousands of years before being resurrected in 1982, the setting of the film. After the events of Days of Future Past, mutants are known by, and in some places, accepted among the general public. The world building is the first thing that stands out. X-Men revisionist history of the 1980s contains many of the familiar pop culture references, which makes the alternate world feel real.
One common criticism is that the first hour of the film is slow, and in some respects, that is valid. Personally, the first hour of collecting Apocalypse's Four Horsemen and the introduction of the new X-Men was entertaining throughout. However, my enjoyment of the buildup might be more so due to my love of the characters and franchise.
Apocalypse's weakest aspect is probably the finale. It's not especially unique compared to other superhero movies, at least narratively speaking. The events that take place are quite different and fun, but the central conflict is ultimately: "Bad guy wants to destroy the world. Good guys try to stop him." For me, it wasn't much of an issue.
X-Men's other weak point is that if you are not invested in the X-Men franchise and remember the previous films, much of the depth is lost. X-Men has been around for 16 years, so the lack of accessibility is certainly an issue. Actually, I have noticed that among younger and new superhero movie fans introduced to the genre during the new MCU era, those fans just do not care about the X-Men. They might go see them in theaters, but the fandom is lacking even half the enthusiasm and voice of the MCU, which is a shame.
Characterization: 8.2/10- Magneto is a highlight in the film. His scenes have so much weight and pathos thanks to Fassbender and the previous development of the character. There is so much emotion to his scenes during the early parts of the film. Unfortunately, he does not play a major role in the middle portion of the film, and the engaging interaction between him and Professor X is minimal. However, everything about his character works so well, despite limited screen time.
Professor X does not have the powerful character arc of Days of Future Past because, at this point, his character is established and stable as he aids the younger generation. Mystique is.... fine the film. Her role serves its purpose in an interesting way for the plot. Hank McCoy, aka Beast, plays a relatively small part as the teacher guiding his students, much like the comics.
Apocalypse, the film's titular antagonist, portrays an interesting type of villainy. Some complain that he lacks menace, partially due to Oscar Isaac's relatively small stature. However, to me, this take on Apocalypse is more of a cult leader giving off an air of benevolence and almost kindness to his followers. Compared to the typical maniacal villain that's trying to takeover the world, Apocalypse's refreshingly calm presence makes for a strong villain. Unfortunately, the finale with Apocalypse is a bit of a letdown after him being such a powerful figure in the comics.
While the other characters all serve their part well, the true standouts are Quicksilver and the new cast members for Scott, Jean, and Nightcrawler. Quicksilver's role and characterization are greatly expanded upon compared to Days of Future Past. And his main scene is absolutely spectacular, easily the best part of the movie; true show stealing stuff. While you might not be able to tell from his part in the original X-Men trilogy, Scott Summers, aka Cyclops, is actually a cool character, almost like the Captain America of the X-Men, so it was great to see a young version of the character being portrayed so well. Jean Grey is equally as stellar in the film, and the subtle romance between the characters is excellently executed. Nightcrawler has been sorely missed from the X-Men films, so it is also great to see his character reestablished. As an X-Men fan, seeing characters other than Wolverine being the focal point is a true pleasure. Storm is also introduced, although her role is smaller, albeit still well executed. With that said, what the heck happened to Jubilee's screen time!?
Direction: 8.5/10- Bryan Singer really knows how to make an X-Men film, despite his reluctance to commit to the classic costumes. His visual style really works, as the film looks and sounds like the 80s. The action sequences, while expectedly inferior to Captain America: Civil War, are rather impressive. The mutant powers on display are fun to watch as no other superheroes have quite the wide range of power sets that the X-Men possess.
Acting: 9.2/10- X-Men's cast is always a highlight and Apocalypse is no exception. Michael Fassbender shines bright with a performance full of gravitas and weight, even more like Sir Ian McKellen's take on the character. Despite having less to do this time around, James McAvoy continues to give a top notch performance. While "phoning-it-in" is an exaggeration, Jennifer Lawrence does not have the type of screen presence compared to her other recent roles, and Nicholas Hoult is always a joy to watch. Oscar Isaac plays the mix of evil and calm excellently as Apocalypse, even if that is not the type of villain viewers expected. Evan Peters’ charisma and charm continues to be a blast to watch as Quicksilver as he steals every scene. Tye Sheridan, Sophie Turner, Kodi Smit-McPhee, and Alexandra Shipp all play the younger versions of classic characters superbly with Turner being the standout as Jean Grey. Everyone else in the cast are good as well.
Special effects: 8.8/10- Aside from the occasional bit of noticeable CGI, X-Men: Apocalypse actually manages a lot of CGI heavy scenes incredibly well with the powers providing very colorful and exciting visuals. Of course, Quicksilver's sequence is the highlight as it almost makes you wonder how the heck did they pull it off!?
Soundtrack: 8.5/10- John Ottman returns to score X-Men: Apocalypse, and his work continues to be high quality and fitting for the film. The use of licensed songs from the 80s added a great sense of fun and familiarity to the period setting.
Humor: 8.7/10- Surprisingly, this is a very funny movie at times. Whether it's Professor X stumbling over his words with MacTaggert or Nightcrawler's clumsiness, the humor is really spot. And again, Quicksilver's scene is brilliant and absolutely hysterical!
Entertainment Value: 9.7/10- As an X-Men fan, X-Men: Apocalypse is a pleasure from beginning to end. The bits of fanservice sprinkled throughout certainly made the film even more fun, especially a certain cameo that was apparently spoiled in a trailer, which I did not see.
Overall: 8.0/10- Making way for the new generation of characters, X-Men: Apocalypse might suffer from a few nagging narrative issues that bring it down from the instant classic territory of the previous two X-Men films, but its exciting new cast, Magneto's riveting scenes, and stunning display of mutant powers makes it a treat for X-Men fans and a fun superhero flick for everyone else. With that said, if you are not invested in, or familiar with the X-Men franchise, the film's score would probably be more of a mid-sevens, rather than a flat eight.
Closing comments: While definitely weaker than either First Class or Days of Future Past, X-Men: Apocalypse is a lot better than the Rotten Tomatoes score gives it credit. Sure, it has flaws, but not every superhero flick can be the masterpiece that is Captain America: Civil War. Below is a review by one of my favorite movie critics and top reviewers on YouTube, Chris Stuckmann, that highlights many of the film's strong points.
Recommended for: X-Men fans, Superhero fans, Action fans,
Click here to check out more of my movie reviews.
If you want to contact us or have any questions please send an e-mail to johnstarslayer@gmail.com.
I agree that the RT scores are harsh and the film improves on a second viewing, but it is far inferior to X-2, First Class and Days and feels 10 years out of date, Avengers doing this end of the world stuff far better, far earlier. The insistence on period settings is a problem, with Deadpool being obviously present day, how do we include him? I'd just like another soft reboot and set them modern day.
ReplyDeleteI definitely agree that it is far inferior to the best X-Men films. And I agree about the finale being not so great. As for Deadpool, I'm not so sure Deadpool would be in an X-Men movie other than a small cameo. He would likely be in the X-Force movie. But it might be interesting if Deadpool does appear in the next X-Men movie.
Delete-James
While not the best of the X-Men movies, but I guess Apocalypse isn't forced or weaker than The Last Stand and Origins: Wolverine. At least Bryan Singer rewrote the character of Cyclops instead of being second fiddle to Wolverine.
ReplyDeleteYep, true. Glad Cyclops was better this time around.
Delete-James
Nice review James! "It has flaws, but not every superhero flick can be the masterpiece that is Captain America: Civil War" -- Basically my thoughts exactly. I enjoyed XM:A. As you said, Quicksilver's scenes were the best. I'm glad Nightcrawler is back and I like the new Jean Grey. There did seem to be less interaction between Charles and Eric and I missed that. Honestly the movie has so much to take in I feel like I can't have a good concept of it till I see it again. :) By the way, the X-Men movies seem messier to me than other Marvel movies (for instance the Cap trilogy), is that just me? Maybe it's just because they have so many characters with powers and so much action. But I still totally enjoy them. :)
ReplyDeleteGlad you enjoyed it too! I agree. I missed the interaction between Charles and Eric. That was the best part of the last two movies for sure. And that's a great point. X-Men movies are messier. The continuity is confusing sometimes. Whereas the MCU is always great. Thanks for the comment! :)
Delete-James
Nice review James! I'm glad you liked it, and I expect I'll at the very least enjoy it once I get around to seeing it. I admit I'm not at all in the X-Men fandom, but as long as the movie is fun and entertaining I won't mind it being a little generic. The biggest interest for me is definitely the cast. I'll watch Oscar Isaac in anything. And I think Tye Sheridan is great, so I'm glad to hear that Scott is done well. And I just saw Kodi Smit-McPhee for the first time in Young Ones (with Nicholas Hoult!), and he really impressed, so I'm looking forward to his Nightcrawler now too! Quicksilver always steals the show, though, doesn't he? I bet the movie's worth watching for his sequence alone. :P
ReplyDeleteThank you Sarah! You should enjoy it. It is miles better than BvS. But still not the best. Isaac is really great. Can't wait to see more of him. Huh, I looked up Young Ones after you mentioned it. Maybe I should check it out! :) And indeed he does! Quicksilver is the best. :)
Delete-James
I really enjoyed this one, and look forward to seeing it again. The first 45 minutes were pretty slow, but overall I thought the film had great emotional resonance, especially centering around both Magneto and Quicksilver.
ReplyDeleteAlso, I've never been a Cyclops fan (so whiny!), but I actually kinda liked this new version. The new Jean Grey left me cold, though. But the new Nightcrawler is such fun! I first saw Kodi Smit-McPhee in Slow West (with Michael Fassbender!) and was so impressed by him there too.
I do know that Marvel has done very little promotional work for the last few X-Men movies because, according to one thing I read, they want the franchise to fail so they can buy it back and fuse it with the MCU. Which annoys me.
Oh, and YES! What was up with Jubilee being sidelined? She was one of my fave characters when I was reading the characters in the '90s.
DeleteHahaha, Hamlette we both did the exact same thing -- "Kodi Smit-McPhee in [something] (with [someone else from X-Men]!)" Exclamation point and everything. XD XD
DeleteI wondered if you'd catch that ;-) I did that on purpose, hee.
DeleteHaha! Nice -- very nice. And we were both impressed too! :D BTW, I think you might like Young Ones, Hamlette. It's a western. Not as much as Slow West apparently is though -- it's set in the future, and a little sci-fi too, but it has a western tone and themes. :)
DeleteI've kind of vaguely heard of The Young Ones -- I'll see if Amazon Instant or the library has it. I'm quite fond of Nicholas Hoult.
DeleteGlad you liked the movie too! And I agree, those were all the best aspects of the film.
DeleteI saw that Slow West is on Amazon Prime. I really need to watch that movie.
That's interesting. Maybe that is what Disney/Marvel is doing. It's a shame though. At least half of the X-Men movies are great.
-James
I liked Slow West enough to want to watch it again. It's got pacing issues, but on a whole, it's an interesting western. Fassbender's character reminds me a little of Eastwood's "Man with No Name" in some ways.
DeleteI found it on Amazon Prime too, so I watched it. :D Didn't love it, but it was interesting and entertaining. The look of it was fantastic!
Delete